Case Comment

Betts v. Menzies citation(s): (1862), 10 H.L.C. 117

copyright 1997 Donald M. Cameron, Aird & Berlis

Contents

• Summary
• Facts
• The Decision
• Endnotes

At p. 153

"An antecedent specification ought not to be held to be an anticipation of a subsequent discovery, unless you have ascertained that the antecedent specification discloses a practicable mode of producing the result which is the effect of the subsequent discovery."

Return to:

Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index

Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index

JurisDiction Home Page