Daily v.
|
copyright 1997 Donald M. Cameron, Aird & Berlis
At p.363
[The third part of the Catnic test is] "... difficult to apply since its formulation combines a negative with an intention to exclude. The draughtsman of a specification would generally be more intent on what he intends to include than to exclude, since all non-included matters might not have been thought of at all."
Return to:
Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index
Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index