Case Comment

Farbwerke Hoechst A.G. v. Halocarbon (Ontario) Ltd. citation(s): [1979] 2 S.C.R. 929

copyright 1997 Donald M. Cameron, Aird & Berlis

Contents

• Summary
• Facts
• The Decision
• Endnotes

Summary

Facts

The Decision

At p. 932:

"At this hearing in this Court, counsel for the respondent raised the contention that the importation of a product manufactured outside Canada did not infringe a Canadian patent for the process whereby it is manufactured elsewhere, but counsel for the appellant was informed that no reply to that submission was required. It will therefore not be dealt with."

Endnotes

Return to:

Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index

Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index

JurisDiction Home Page