Improver Corp. v.
|
copyright 1997 Donald M. Cameron, Aird & Berlis
At p. 78
"In the light of Lord Diplock's speech in Catnic, it has to be remembered that what is being considered is all the process of asking and answering the single question whether or not there has been infringement."
Return to:
Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index
Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index